The two stories · 5 of 25The Mahabharata and the Gita
Next
The two stories

The Mahabharata and the Gita

The is not a book on its own. It is one conversation inside the , the longest Hindu epic, about a family at war. Before comparing ideas, know the plot: who is who, what happens, and whether anyone in it is truly good.

The Mahabharata: 18 parvas about a family war

Tradition credits the sage with the , a poem of about 100,000 verses divided into 18 sections, each called a in . It grew over several centuries and was told and retold by many people, mostly through spoken performance, so versions differ from region to region. What follows is the widely shared core of the story. Its central question is what (duty) demands when duties collide.

Who is who: two sides of one family

Both sides are cousins from the same royal family. This is not one people fighting outsiders. It is a family tearing itself apart, and nearly every name below is related to another.

The Pandavas

The five sons of the late king .

  • The eldest, known for truthfulness. He gambles the kingdom away.
  • The second, the strongest.
  • The third, the finest archer. He is the one who speaks with in the .
  • and The twins, the youngest two.
  • Their wife, shamed in open court.
  • Their mother.
The Kauravas

The hundred sons of the blind king , who hold the throne.

  • The eldest, who refuses to share the kingdom.
  • His brother, who drags into the court.
  • Their blind father, the king.
  • Their mother, who lost all her sons and curses .
  • Their uncle, who tricks at dice.
Krishna: neither side

is not a Pandava or a Kaurava. He is the ' cousin and 's close friend. Before the war he offered his great army to one side and himself, without weapons, to the other. chose the army. chose . So fights for no one: he drives 's chariot and speaks the . Many Hindus worship him as God.

Fighting for the Kauravas, out of loyalty
  • The grand elder of the family, bound by a vow to defend the throne.
  • The teacher who trained both the and the .
  • A great archer who is secretly the ' eldest brother, born to before her marriage. He fights for , his only friend.
The tellers of the story
  • The poet credited with the . He is also the grandfather of both families.
  • The king's minister, who tells what happens on the battlefield, including the .
1. A family quarrelTwo sets of cousins, the five and the hundred , both claim the throne of .
↓
2. The dice game, eldest of the , gambles away his kingdom, his brothers and his wife , who is shamed in open court. The go into exile for 13 years.
↓
3. Peace failsThe refuse to return even five villages. goes as an envoy and is turned away.
↓
4. The eve of battle ( 6)On the field of , sees teachers and relatives on the other side and puts down his bow. , driving his chariot, answers him: this is the .
↓
5. Eighteen days of warAlmost everyone on both sides dies. The win, and rule over a ruined kingdom.
↓
6. The ending's own clan destroys itself. The give up the throne and walk north toward the Himalayas to reach heaven. One by one the others fall along the way, and only arrives.
Four moments of the war worth knowing

The eighteen days of war are remembered for four moments when the side said to stand for won by breaking a rule. Tap each to see what happened and why it matters. Details differ a little between regional versions of the epic.

Drona and "Ashwatthama is dead"

What happened. The teacher was the ' commander and could not be beaten while he held his weapons. killed an elephant named , the same name as 's beloved son, and shouted that was dead. would believe only , who never lied. said " is dead," and added quietly "man or elephant". had the war conches blown so that did not hear the last words. put down his weapons in grief and was killed.

Why it matters. Even the most truthful man gave a half-truth to win. The epic says that until then 's chariot moved a little above the ground, a sign of his truthfulness, and from that day it touched the earth. Victory cost him his purity.

Karna and the stuck chariot

What happened. In his last duel with , 's chariot wheel sank into the mud. He climbed down to free it and asked to wait, as the rules of war say a man in trouble should not be struck. answered that had not kept those rules when was shamed or when the young was killed by many warriors at once. shot, and fell.

Why it matters. It raises a hard question: can you claim the protection of the rules after you broke them yourself? Readers have argued about it ever since, and it is one of the moments when 's guidance looks most like "the end justifies the means".

Bhishma and the shield of Shikhandi

What happened. The grand elder could choose the hour of his own death and could not be beaten in battle. He had vowed never to fight a woman. had been born a woman, so would not raise his weapons against . stood behind and shot arrows past, and fell onto a bed of arrows.

Why it matters. The won by using a loophole in the honor code of a man they loved. himself had told them how to defeat him, which shows that this was no simple wrong. It shows that even the noblest defeat in the epic is morally mixed.

Duryodhana struck below the belt

What happened. In a duel with maces, the rule was never to strike below the waist. After a long fight, signaled to by slapping his own thigh. remembered his vow to break 's thigh for what had been done to , struck there, and fell. 's brother , who had taught , was furious at the foul blow.

Why it matters. Here the rule of fair fighting collides with a promise of revenge. The choose the vow over the rule, and the epic lets even 's own brother call it wrong.

Taken together, the epic is telling us that this war had no clean victory. The side said to be right could win only by doing wrong, with 's guidance, and the cost follows them to the end. , who lost all her sons, curses : his own clan will destroy itself, and it does. This is why many Hindus say the teaches that is "subtle": hard to see, and costly even when you see it.

How the fits: the whole epic is being told to the blind king by his minister , which is why the begins with the king asking what his sons did on the battlefield. Scholars debate when the was placed into the , but within the story it is one conversation, held just before the fighting begins.

Where it goes wrong: so who is the good one?

A reader will ask who the heroes and villains are. The two books answer very differently.

Is there a clear good side?
The Mahabharata

Not clearlyTradition sees the as standing for and for its opposite. But the epic itself will not make it simple. Both sides break the rules of war, and the win partly by deceit, as the four moments above show. Honorable men fight for the out of loyalty.

The Bible

Yes, and it is not usThe Bible names one who is good: God. "No one is good except one—God" (). Everyone else, on every side, has fallen short, with one exception: Jesus.

Where do the heroes fall short?
The Mahabharata

Everywhere, and the epic lets it stand, the truthful one, gambles away his wife. The victors rule over ruins, and curses even . The epic often says that is "subtle", meaning hard to see.

The Bible

Everywhere, except oneThe Bible tells the failures of its own heroes: Abraham, Moses, David and Peter. "There is no one ; no, not one" (). "All have sinned, and fall short of the glory of God" (). With one exception, below.

Is there anyone who never falls short?
The Mahabharata

No oneEvery character fails somewhere, and even 's part in the war's deceits is questioned inside the epic.

The Bible

One: Jesus, the perfect man and the perfect GodHe is fully human and fully God (, ). He was tempted in every way as we are, yet without sin (). "He committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth" (). Jesus never fell short, not once.

Who is the enemy?
The Mahabharata

Other peopleThe enemy is a rival family, and in the end the cost falls on everyone.

The Bible

Sin and an evil spirit, and the heartThe deceiver, Satan, is the enemy behind it (), but the problem also lies within every person. No human side is the good side. The only good one is Jesus, God made man.

What your friend may sayWhat Hindus often say

  • "That is the point of the ." Many Hindus say the epic is deliberately honest that life is morally mixed, with no one fully right, and that wisdom comes from thinking hard about that.

Your strongest answerHow a Christian answers

A story that leaves good and evil unsettled cannot tell you which side you are on, or what to do about the wrong in your own heart. The Bible gives a clear standard, God Himself, and a clear verdict: no one meets it, except one. Jesus never fell short, and that is exactly why He can save us. He is the answer that a confused and broken world needs. Christ, the one who is , died "the for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God" ().

What it asks, and what the Bible announces

The Mahabharata asks

What is the right thing to do when every choice costs something? It never settles the answer, and the story ends in grief.

The Bible announces

What has God done about a broken world? Its answer is a rescue, and the story ends in restoration.

Christ above all

The ends in grief: the victors have lost nearly everyone they love, and no one in the story is truly good. The Bible ends with Jesus Christ, the who was slain, honored by all creation (). He is the one who never fell short.

In short

The Gita is one conversation inside the Mahabharata, a family war with no clean victory. Its heroes win by deceit and no one in it is good. The Bible names one who never fell short: Jesus.

Why the next step followsNext, the Ramayana, and why Rama is not like Jesus.The Ramayana →
Pause and reflect

The Mahabharata ends in grief, with no one fully good. Where do you see that same brokenness in your own heart, and why do you need someone who never fell short?